This new authenticity and precision of your own questionnaire was in fact looked at and corrected in accordance with the pre-decide to try

This new authenticity and precision of your own questionnaire was in fact looked at and corrected in accordance with the pre-decide to try

For the , this study chose a couple of categories within the Chengdu Shishi secondary school and Jinniu secondary school respectively, distributed three hundred questionnaires, retrieved 278 questionnaires, deducted several invalid questionnaires and you may 266 legitimate questionnaires. The fresh authoritative analysis try completed regarding .

Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) showed that the sports leisure attitude scale with 16 items was suitable for factor analysis (KMO = 0.87, Bartlett’s test for sphericity p < 0.001), and three common factors could be extracted, and the corresponding Cronbach' ? coefficients were 0.84, 0.81, and 0.83 respectively. In addition, the overall scale ? coefficient = 0.85; Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) showed that the fitness indexes AGFI, CFI, NFI, and IFI were 0.92, 0.95, 0.93, and 0.91, which were all greater than the standard of 0.90, RMSEA = 0.03 (less than 0.05, with good adaptation); In addition, the combined reliability of the three common factors (potential variables) is more than 0.79, which shows that the scale has good reliability and validity.

Canonical relationship research is actually a statistical strategy always take to the new correlation studies anywhere between that group of manage parameters and something class of traditional variables

Exploratory factor analysis showed that the leisure motivation scale with 21 items was suitable for factor analysis (KMO = 0.78, Bartlett’s test for sphericity p < 0.001). The scale could extract 4 common factors, corresponding to Cronbach' ? coefficient is between 0.79–0.85, and the overall scale ? Coefficient = 0.88; Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the fitness indexes AGFI, CFI, NFI, and IFI were 0.91, 0.92, 0.92, and 0.93, which were all greater than the standard of 0.90, RMSEA = 0.04 (less than 0.05, good adaptation); In addition, the combined reliability of the four dimensions (potential variables) is more than 0.81, which shows that the reliability and validity of this scale are good.

Exploratory factor analysis showed that the leisure barriers scale with 17 items was suitable asiame ipuçları for factor analysis (KMO = 0.85, Bartlett ball test p < 0.001). The scale could extract three common factors, corresponding to Cronbach' ? coefficient is between 0.82–0.86, and the overall scale ? Coefficient = 0.85; Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the fitness indexes AGFI, CFI, NFI, and IFI were 0.94, 0.90, 0.91, and 0.93, which were all greater than the standard of 0.90, RMSEA = 0.02 (less than 0.05, good adaptation); In addition, the combined reliability of the three dimensions (potential variables) is more than 0.79, which shows that the reliability and validity of this scale are good.

Exploratory factor analysis showed that the leisure satisfaction scale with 25 items was suitable for factor analysis (KMO = 0.82, Bartlett’s test for sphericity p < 0.001). The scale could extract 6 common factors, corresponding to Cronbach' ? coefficient is between 0.81–0.86, and the overall scale ? Coefficient = 0.84; Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the fitness indexes AGFI, CFI, NFI, and IFI were 0.91, 0.93, 0.95, and 0.92 in order, which was all greater than the standard of 0.90, RMSEA = 0.03 (less than 0.05, good adaptation); In addition, the combined reliability of the six dimensions (potential variables) is more than 0.81, which shows that the reliability and validity of this scale are good.

Statistical Statistics

They will discover limit correlation within linear combination of manage variables together with linear blend of standard variables. Hence, canonical relationship analysis screening the fresh new canonical correlation blend of numerous criterion parameters and you may multiple manage details, Canonical relationship data can create a mixture of extreme and you will unimportant canonical relationship. Fundamentally, it will deliver the adopting the first recommendations: a person is an average relationship coefficient is also reflect the fresh new correlation training within linear mix of handle details in addition to linear consolidation from simple variables. The typical relationship coefficient need certainly to arrive at a serious peak so you can portray the significant correlation between them sets of linear combinations. The second is the latest judgment coefficient (we.e., the fresh new rectangular worth of normal relationship coefficient R). This means that the typical things of simple variable can be feel informed me of the typical items of one’s control changeable (for around 10%). The third is the structural coefficient (typical stream). It’s intended to handle the relationship within variable and you can the newest traditional changeable to their respective regular linear combos. The absolute value of the fresh coefficient have to be more than 0.29 to describe one to the particular regular linear combinations have explanatory strength.

Lascia un commento

Il tuo indirizzo email non sarà pubblicato. I campi obbligatori sono contrassegnati *