D. Salinger moon when you’re an excellent “bored white cat” turns up, moves more, and bites their left-hand

D. Salinger moon when you’re an excellent “bored white cat” turns up, moves more, and bites their left-hand

An explanation out-of Seymour as the a physical entity nearly demonstrates Buddy’s undoing

/. Friend are definitely the basic so you can acknowledge your poems remove something-much -in “interpretation because of the paraphrase.” However the development is obvious: unsentimentalized lesser moments away from major illumination or epiphany; carefully etched vignettes and this let you know brand new “religious mechanism” within the externals. Since the a great critic, Seymour was depicted using his reviews into the a good amount of Buddy’s stories, and essence away from his advice is summarized in 2 concerns he says to Pal he’ll getting expected as the a writer when he dies: “Had been your primary famous people out? Was indeed you hectic composing the center out?” Whether or not Seymour’s inquiries, like their poems, cannot really be paraphrased, he appears to suggest that sense and you will effect -within their greatest sensory faculties -must be doing work in high composing; and for the viewer it feel men and women elusive, indefinable qualities that will be profoundly moving and you will lighting-up. As he passes through a list regarding Seymour’s real characteristics – locks, ears, vision, nostrils, sound, epidermis, attire – he becomes an increasing number of invasive and less coherent, occasionally, appear to, painfully close disintegration (for example, the guy announces shortly after a short passing into the Seymour’s ears, “I will sleep. . . . The hands is perspiration, the latest bowels churning. The Provided Kid is not at home”). “Seymour: An intro” seems less a narrative because an assemblage from notes, findings, stories, and irrelevancies (“flowering parentheses”), similar to Pal’s (otherwise Salinger’s) journal, at which a story you’ll one-day be produced. The brand new Seymour one to exists tends to be similar to the Seymour we have come to understand already; the latest point is actually shown, the fresh new intricacies found, however, zero truly the fresh size is put in their portrait. In a www.datingranking.net/es/tatuaje-de-citas manner, after that, the story was Buddy’s, as we get a hold of your for the first time throughout their misery from heart attempting to maintain and 41

On the facts, records are created, such as towards really works you to definitely Buddy features authored, that force so it personality

strengthen their master on evasive facts lurking in the Seymour’s existence. The guy appears inside eager demand for him or her. He introduces themselves at first, with a few irony, just like the an enthusiastic “ecstatically happier son”; and at the finish, when he makes to check out category, he realizes that “no procedure” he really does try “more important than starting one to terrible Space 307.” Due to the fact Seymour immediately after told you, “all of the i do our very own entire lives is actually go from one nothing piece of Holy Soil to another.” “Seymour: An introduction” can be said to have the setting you to conceals form, with the appearing irrelevancies purposely made to carry out a level more than common fantasy out of truth – the true truth (a strategy, by-the-way, quite normal, given that witness Dostoevski’s “Cards out of Below ground” or Rilke’s The laptop away from Malte Laurids Brigge). However,, nevertheless, discover a constant doubt concerning author’s manage, any doubt that’s slightly reinforced of the Pal’s recurrent resemblance to help you Salinger. Certainly Friend’s work is actually Brand new Catcher in the Rye, two anyone else is “Increase Highest the fresh new Roof Ray, Carpenters” (where Pal is actually narrator) and you will “The best Big date having Bananafish” (and then he was not), nonetheless some other was “Teddy” (Pal actually quotes of it). For example details because these and others don’t, however, confirm some thing, nevertheless they would suggest – and just suggest – one Salinger are discussing, however obliquely, his or her own death of manage and you may diffusion from talent. Salinger’s much time quiet following the look of “Seymour: An introduction” in the 1959 is concluded in 1965 to the book of another part on Glass saga, “Hapworth 16, 1924.” That it tale performed nothing to reassure people who hoped-for a beneficial return to the earlier perfection away from Catcher from the Rye. Indeed, they had a tendency to coordinate the individuals properties of your later on functions which really clients located distressful- a tiresome duration, a laughs will worry about-consciously lovable, an excellent muting off narrative and only philosophical asides. However in spite 42

Lascia un commento

Il tuo indirizzo email non sarà pubblicato. I campi obbligatori sono contrassegnati *